One Minute Summary Survey

Supplemental Material

 

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

Spring 2002

 

Course Number:          

Management Science 224

Course Title:

Executive Decision Making

Course

Description:

Concepts and methods for making complex decisions in business and government; identifying objectives and alternatives, setting priorities, allocating resources, planning, resolving conflict, and making group decisions.

 

Professor:

Dr. Ernest Forman.  Monroe 402. 202-994-6206.

E-mail: forman@gwu.edu

Office Hours:

By Appointment: See http://mdm.gwu.edu/forman

 

Required

Textbooks / Software:

Forman, Ernest H., and Selly, Mary Ann,  Decision By Objectives, World Scientific Press, 2001, or download from

http://mdm.gwu.edu/forman

 

Expert Choice 2000 download:

http://extranet.expertchoice.com Username: fall2000; PW: gwu

Click on Expert Choice 2000  Beta7

User ID for installation with full features to be e-mailed.

 

Optional: Expert Choice CD -- available from Mgt Sci. Secretary

Supplemental Textbooks:

Thomas L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA. 1986

Thomas L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Volume VI of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA. 1994.

 

Additional Resources

http://mdm.gwu.edu/forman/224.htm

 

Prometheus:

Within two days after first class, visit: http://prometheus.gwu.edu

If you do not have a student account, then click on create new student account.

Distance Education: Log in to Course # :

Foggy Bottom: 47346

Distance Education: 47364

Password to be e-mailed.

Course Objectives:

 To enable students to:

o Structure complex decision problems

o Identify alternatives

o Identify objectives

o Identify constraints

o Incorporate both quantitative and qualitative information in the decision process

o Deal with competing factors

o Investigate sensitivity of decisions

o Communicate recommendations and rationale

o Deal with group decisions and conflict

o Learn how to communicate better both orally and in writing

o Make effective presentations

Method of Instruction:

Lectures, projects, student presentations.  Students will learn by applying theoretical decision making concepts to real world problems.  A large portion of the course is devoted to oral/Powerpoint and written presentations.  The Professor will provide individual guidance throughout the course both during classroom presentations as well as in individual and electronic consultations (e.g., Prometheus ICHAT).

Method for Grading:

The final grade will be based on deliverables (projects), and student presentations.  A short quiz may be given at the end of the course.  

Assignments:

Projects, presentations, and research/lecture.

 


 

REAL WORLD PROJECTS (Projects A and B)

 

Two projects are to be performed by each student working in a group of two (individual projects or larger groups may be allowed depending on circumstances.)  Each project will address an important, interesting and complex real world decision. 

 

Project "A" will involve a business, political or societal REAL WORLD decision, evaluated from the perspective of a specific decision maker (makers).

 

Project "B" will be a resource allocation or analytic network process model.

 

Project C --RESEARCH LECTURES

 

Students, working in groups of about four or five individuals, will research, prepare an annotated bibliography and lecture notes, and make a presentation on one of the following:

A) Another multi-criteria decision methodology such as MAUT or ELECTRE.  A starting reference is “Making Multiple-Objective Decisions” by Mansooreh Mollaghasemi and Julia Pet-Edwards, from the IEEE Computer Society. http://computer.org

 

B)  A contemporary management trend or business process, such as:

Management by Objectives

Zero based budgeting

Total Quality Management

Quality Function Deployment

Business Process Re-engineering

Performance Metrics

The Balanced Scorecard

The first part of the presentation should include a discussion of the history, content, strengths, weaknesses, successes, and failures.  The second part of the presentation is to include a framework and examples of how concepts  and processes for structuring, measuring and synthesis studied in this course are applicable to the management trend or business process.

 

Topics for Project C must be approved by the Professor beforehand.

 

 

PROJECT PRESENTATIONS

 

For each real world project, a presentation of the decision problem, alternative solutions, objectives, background information, plan of attack and preliminary decision model will be made to the class (via Powerpoint slides and notes for distance education section).  Class critique will be used to improve the problem definition, model and plan of attack as appropriate.  A subsequent presentation will be made to the class after completing the project. 

 

 

 

PROJECT REPORTS

 

A complete draft will be submitted followed by a revision for each real world project.  Each class member will be a reader for one project during the semester.  Examples of projects from prior classes can be found at http://mdm.gwu.edu/forman


 

                                                                   Class Meetings

 

Session 1

 

Decision making phases.  What is a good decision? Multiple objectives.  Why are decisions difficult?  Cognitive limitations. Unfreezing.  Non-linear utility.  Need to combine different scales. Subjectivity.  Pros and cons.  Why models go wrong.  Scales of measurement.  Weights and scores.  Difficulties.  Relative vs. absolute judgments. Use of words instead of numbers.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).

 

Assignment: Respond to Personal Info. Discussion Topic in Prometheus.

Begin reading texts -- proceed at your own pace and in concert with the topics in the syllabus.

 

Session 2

 

Overview of Expert Choice software.  Examining an existing multi‑objective model including goal, objectives and alternatives.  Making judgments.  Synthesizing to arrive at a tentative solution. Sensitivity analysis. Creating a small model.

Modes of comparisons (Verbal, Numerical, Graphical).  Missing judgments.  Validation exercise. 

Assignment: Identify an interesting personal decision to be evaluated and presented in class #4.

Session 3

 

Review of complex choice models.  Data Grid for global alternatives. Ratings, step functions, utility curves and direct priorities.

 

Uncertainty and forecasting.  Scenarios and Players. Mathematics of AHP: redundancy, eigenvector solution, inconsistency.  Causes of inconsistency and improving consistency. Ideal and distributive synthesis modes. Axioms of AHP.

 

Session 4

              

Personal model presentations.

(Submit: General Discussion – Personal Choice Models)

Uncertainty and forecasting.

Session 5                   

 

Presentation and discussion of first project plans and preliminary models for groups GA1-GA5.

(Submit: Project A – A1 Initial Presentation. Annotated Powerpoint file and EC Model)

Session 6                   

              

Presentation and discussion of first project plans and preliminary models for groups GA6-GA10.

Session 7

 

Resource Allocation.

First Draft of Project A to Student Reader

(Submit: Project A – A2 first draft for Student Reader. Word file and EC Model)

…(Submit: Project A – A3 review of first draft by Student Reader)

Session 8

 

Resource Allocation continued.

First Draft of Project A due.

(Submit: Project A – A4 first draft for Professor. Word file and EC Model)

Session 9

 

Feedback in decision modeling.

The Analytic Network Process (ANP)

First draft of Project A returned.

(Project A – A5 first draft reviewed by Professor)           

Session 10

 

Presentation and discussion of second project plans and preliminary models for all groups (GB1-GB10).

(Submit Project A – A6 second draft for Professor. Word file and EC Model)

(Submit Project B – B1 initial presentation. Annotated Powerpoint file and EC Model)

Sessions 11

 

Meeting facilitation, group decision making, and conferencing (Part I)

First draft of Project B due.

Second draft of Project A due.

 (Mid Week Prior --Submit Project B – B2 first draft for Student Reader)

…(Next Day -Submit: Project B – B3 review of first draft by Student Reader)

(Submit: Project B – B4 first draft for Professor. Word file and EC Model)

 

Session 12

Meeting facilitation, group decision making, and conferencing (Part II)

(Project B – B5 first draft reviewed by Professor)

Session 13

 

Project C Presentations

Second draft of Project B due.

(Submit Project C – Powerpoint and Annotated Bibliography)

(Submit Project B – B6 second draft for Professor. Word file and EC Model)

Session 14

 

Final (polished) presentations of projects A and B.
(Submit A7 and B7 Annotated Powerpoints)

 

 

 

                  Project Report Requirements and Guidelines

 

The following guidelines may help you in selecting and organizing your work.

·        Choose problems/decisions that are both important and interesting and will ‘make something happen’.  Avoid hypothetical problems/decisions or those that have already been made.

·        Each project paper should state why you are doing the project and indicate your involvement or connection with the organization for whom the project is being done.

·        Emphasize the problem being addressed, not the model or approach, e.g. start by discussing the problem, not methods.

·        Explain what you have done (and how you did it) assuming the reader has no knowledge of modeling, or methods such as AHP or optimization. 

·        Include a meaningful title.  Avoid titles such as Project A…

·        Include a succinct Abstract

·        Integrate figures into the report and make meaningful references.

Figures, tables, etc. cited in the report should be titled, numbered, and included in the body of the report.  Others can be in appendix.

·        Number pages.

·        Single space

·        Check for widow/orphans, spelling, good grammar.

·        Discuss the significance of both the results, and the process of arriving at the results.

·        Identify/discuss alternative approaches to solving the problem (if appropriate).

·        Include Information Documents for the Goal, other major objectives, and the alternatives in your AHP models.

·        Bibliography.

 

First drafts of papers are to be COMPLETE drafts.  When preparing second draft, it is advisable to revise according to comments made on first draft.

 

 


 

Major Grading Criteria

Interest/importance of topic

Model structure and analysis

Organization and comprehensibility of the written report

Good use of English Language



 

EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY

 

            As an expression of the overall philosophy of the Department of Management Science, during your coursework you will have an opportunity to learn material of substantive importance to you as a professional.  Simultaneously, you will have variety of opportunities to enhance your professional skills by:

 

            m              applying the ideas of the course to identifying and solving real world problems;

 

            m              reading more perceptively when doing primary and secondary research required to solve such problems;

 

            m              writing more effectively;

 

            m              working more creatively with others in organizational settings;

 

            m              presenting your ideas more effectively in public forums;

 

            m              learning to learn.